LabWrite Project 2000

LabCheck-List

TitleÖ
describes the specific content of the lab concisely but with enough detail to get the main ideas across to the reader.
AbstractÖ
summarizes the gist of each section of the report in a sentence (or two for an especially complex section).
arranges the sentences in the order the sections are presented in the report.
stays within the maximum words allowed (usually 200 words, but be sure toÝ adhere to the requirements of your class).
IntroductionÖ
opens by establishing the learning context for the lab (the scientific concept or procedure that the lab is about).
provides sufficient background for the learning context:Ý telling what you know about the learning context from your lab manual, textbook, class notes, and (in more sophisticated labs) research into the pertinent scientific literature.
presents the goals of the lab:Ý (1) the objective(s) of the lab procedure and (2) the overall purpose, which links the objective(s) to the learning context.Ý (The purpose can be in the form of a statement or a question.)
clearly states the hypothesis.
provides sufficient and logical reasoning supporting the hypothesis (based on the science of the learning context).
Materials and MethodsÖ
clearly identifies all the key materials used in the lab (depending on the format you have been assigned to use, this could be in a bulleted list or integrated within the description of the method).
provides a concise, step-by-step description of the specific procedures followed in the lab.
gives enough detail that the experiment could be repeated by a competent scientist in the field.
avoids unnecessary details, particularly full descriptions of standard procedures that a competent scientist would already know.
follows the format specified for this lab course.
focuses only on reporting the data, successfully avoiding giving any results.
ResultsÖ
begins with a sentence or two describing the overall findings of the experimental procedure.
presents only those visuals--tables, graphs, or drawings--that are necessary to tell the "story" of the data.
includes verbal descriptions of the findings for each visual:Ý a statement of either the summary of the visual or the most important point of the visual.
supports the findings (where necessary) with additional details, such as statistics, from the visuals.
presents the findings in an order that best represents the data:Ý chronological order, order of importance, order of generality.
includes citations to the visuals in the appropriate form.
reports only the data from the experiment, successfully avoiding any explanations or conclusions about the data.
DiscussionÖ
begins with a statement of whether or not the overall results support or do not support the hypothesis.
provides a sufficient and logical explanation (including, where appropriate, a treatment of possible sources of error) for the relationship between the results and the hypothesis.
compares (where appropriate) lab results to results of the same or similar experiments (from other students in the lab or in articles from the scientific literature) and explains the comparative results.
addresses other pertinent considerations appropriate to the Discussion.
ConclusionÖ
directly states what you have learned about the science of learning context from doing the experimental procedure.
gives enough details to convince the reader that you learned what you claim to have learned.
PresentationÖ
uses the appropriate forms for citations and references (ask your teacher if you're not sure what the appropriate forms are).
uses the correct format (titles, captions, etc.) for the tables, graphs, and drawings.
is written in a scientific style (sentences should be clear and to the point).
uses verb tenses appropriate to each section.
is clear of grammatical errors (you should read through it twice just to look for these errors).
is clear of spelling errors (use the spell check on your computer).
has all the necessary headings (each section of the report should have a heading).

 


Home | Pre-Lab | In-Lab | Post-Lab | LabCheck | Resources

© Copyright LabWrite Project 2000
Visit Our University
Sponsored and funded by
National Science Foundation - Grant # 9950405


LabWrite Project Team
Michael Carter Ph.D., Science Communication; Dept. of English
Eric N. Wiebe Ph.D., Graphic Communications Program;
Dept. of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education
Miriam Ferzli, Research Assistant, Science Education

We welcome your feedback!


Web Designer: Judy Lambert